Telangana Excessive Court docket pulls up State govt on steep parking payment



Revealed: Revealed Date – 10:57 PM, Mon – 20 June 22

File Photograph: Telangana Excessive Court docket

Hyderabad: A two-judge panel, comprising Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili, of the Telangana Excessive Court docket issued a discover to the State authorities and GHMC on Monday in a suo moto PIL.

The PIL issues the gathering of steep parking payment by sure hospitals, malls and cinema theatres, amongst different industrial institutions, beneath the guise of upkeep and safety. It argues that the above-mentioned institutions are mandated to offer free parking to shoppers and that constructing permission is just granted by authorities if sufficient parking area is offered by these issues. It additional explains that the levying of a parking payment has triggered monetary loss for sure shoppers. The case was adjourned to August 2.

Write attraction dismissed

The panel dismissed a writ attraction filed by Naveen S Garewal, a journalist, in opposition to the orders of a single choose of the Excessive Court docket directing discover in a writ petition filed difficult the disciplinary proceedings initiated in opposition to him by the Tribune Belief.

The panel, whereas in search of rationalization from the petitioner as to how a writ petition was maintainable in opposition to a newspaper, opined that there was no illegality in ordering a discover in such matter. The panel reasoned that mere issuance of a discover by the one choose doesn’t quantity to adjudicating the matter and due to this fact the writ attraction was misconceived.

Litigation involving Ramalinga Raju

The identical panel on Monday directed the Civil Court docket to eliminate inside six months a litigation pending earlier than it involving Satyam Pc Providers Ltd and Ramalinga Raju.

The panel was listening to a civil revision petition on the query of jurisdiction. The issues had been disposed of in mild of subsequent orders handed by the Industrial Court docket and the swimsuit was returned to the Civil Court docket. The attraction and the petition had been filed by Srinivas Talluri. The counsel showing for Satyam and Raju dropped at the discover of the court docket that the civil swimsuit and the civil revision petition had been 10 years previous. The panel directed the Civil Court docket to conclude all associated proceedings inside six months. The panel additionally made it clear that it was open to the events to boost acceptable points earlier than the Civil Court docket which might expeditiously take care of such purposes.


Supply hyperlink