[ad_1]
Chennai: The Madras excessive courtroom on Wednesday reserved its order on a plea difficult set up of a statue of former chief minister M Karunanidhi at a privately-owned plot adjoining the Girivalam path in Tiruvannamalai, by a non-public belief based by state minister E V Velu.
Reserving the order, a trip bench of Justice M S Ramesh and Justice Mohammed Shafiq puzzled as to how the plea may very well be entertained when the land is privately owned property.
The bench made the statement in view of the submission made by the district administration that the land by which the statue was proposed to be constructed was a patta land. On Could 19, a trip bench of the courtroom restrained Velu and Jeeva Academic Belief from erecting a statue in view of the allegation of the petitioner that the statue is proposed to be put up in an encroached public land abutting Thiruvannamalai Girivalam path.
The difficulty pertains to a plea moved by G Karthik, towards erection of the statue.
The petitioner claimed that the construction was to come back up on an encroached land in collusion with the district administration.
Opposing the plea, the federal government asserted that there isn’t a illegality within the matter and that the writ petition itself isn’t maintainable on the bottom that the petitioner has no locus to file the petition in respect of such points, the place he has no connection in any respect.
Reserving the order, a trip bench of Justice M S Ramesh and Justice Mohammed Shafiq puzzled as to how the plea may very well be entertained when the land is privately owned property.
The bench made the statement in view of the submission made by the district administration that the land by which the statue was proposed to be constructed was a patta land. On Could 19, a trip bench of the courtroom restrained Velu and Jeeva Academic Belief from erecting a statue in view of the allegation of the petitioner that the statue is proposed to be put up in an encroached public land abutting Thiruvannamalai Girivalam path.
The difficulty pertains to a plea moved by G Karthik, towards erection of the statue.
The petitioner claimed that the construction was to come back up on an encroached land in collusion with the district administration.
Opposing the plea, the federal government asserted that there isn’t a illegality within the matter and that the writ petition itself isn’t maintainable on the bottom that the petitioner has no locus to file the petition in respect of such points, the place he has no connection in any respect.
[ad_2]
Supply hyperlink